The difference
‘Hong Kong protects minority rights while, in Singapore, money largely
decides the fate of a collective sale.’
MR AUGUSTINE CHEAH: ‘As Ms Tan Hui Yee pointed out on Monday (’En bloc
debate, HK style’), the key difference between Hong Kong and Singapore
regarding collective property sales is that Hong Kong protects minority
rights while, in Singapore, money largely decides the fate of a collective
sale. One gets far more home ownership security in public housing than in
expensive private housing. With more Singaporeans moving from public
housing into condos, the deficiency in our collective sale laws must be
addressed properly as it will affect a larger number of people in time to
come. The authorities such as the Law Ministry and the Urban Redevelopment
Authority have received many suggestions over the past two years, but
official replies have been few. Certainly, we have not seen any changes.
To proponents of the comparatively liberal collective sale laws who argue
that these laws are no different from compulsory government acquisitions
of the past, Ms Tan’s explanation nails the difference neatly: Private
developers make a profit at the expense of someone’s home in collective
sales, while government acquisition is a sacrifice made for the public
good.’
|